Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brandon Nakashima vs Yannick Hanfmann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Hanfmann analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Yannick Hanfmann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 0 Hanfmann
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.01% of points on his second serve, while Hanfmann has won 49.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 48.04% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hanfmann has won 47.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.26% and 29.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 68.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hanfmann has saved 57.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 61.18% of matches played (W/L 52/ 33), with Hanfmann winning 44.07% (W/L 26/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 28/ 26). Hanfmann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 206/ 119), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 14/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75.61% of matches (W/L 31/ 10), where as Hanfmann has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 46.88% of matches (W/L 15/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nakashima winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 2 and Hanfmann winning 0. The last match between Nakashima and Hanfmann was at the Oeiras 3 Challenger, 17-05-2021, First, Clay with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Hanfmann have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nakashima winning 0 times and Hanfmann 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 0, and Hanfmann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 231.91 while Hanfmann has played against players with an average rank of 155.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hanfmann has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 34.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hanfmann has converted 33.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 0 Hanfmann
72
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
59
Rank
45
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
62% (192-120)
Career Total W/L
59% (340-240)
71% (34-14)
YTD W/L
41% (11-16)
$1,648,985
Career Prize Money
$1,511,970
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Yannick Hanfmann |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:20 | 1:32:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (38/63) | 53% (35/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (32/38) | 74% (26/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (11/25) | 42% (13/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (27/66) | 32% (20/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Yannick Hanfmann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (34/14) | 41% (11/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (71/37) | 37% (25/42) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (596/507) | 46% (289/345) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 40% (4/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 41% (7/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.65 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 350 | 94 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:39 | 1:50:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 278.31 | 176.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (2250/3490) | 65% (1279/1968) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (1679/2250) | 65% (825/1279) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (696/1240) | 50% (343/689) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (103/300) | 34% (57/168) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (1343/3634) | 36% (700/1933) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 64% (7/4) | 45% (5/6) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 42% (5/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 77% (23/7) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (33/47) | 40% (10/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 65% (17/26) | 30% (3/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (9/14) | 69% (9/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (31/28) | 50% (8/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (31/3) | 38% (8/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 32% (19/6) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
33 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
16
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Yannick Hanfmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Maximilian Marterer
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
70%
(
76 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(6) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
75%
(
103 of
138)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
64 of
138)
127
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(7) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Nakashima Vs Hanfmann Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Brandon Nakashima
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Yannick Hanfmann
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
